280 | 3 | 4 |
下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
【目的】新疆地处我国西北部,依据新疆的气候特征与现代畜牧业的急速发展所需的牧草种植需求。【方法】在探明种植比例对牧草生产性能影响的基础上,归纳出相对双优的混播模式,以紫花苜蓿、扁穗冰草两种牧草按豆禾比例(3∶7、4∶6、5∶5、6∶4、7∶3)进行同行种植人工草地与单播对比,分析其播种当年生长指标、茎叶比、生物量贡献率的变化。【结果】紫花苜蓿和扁穗冰草分别在4∶6和7∶3时株高趋于最高;紫花苜蓿在3∶7时叶长叶宽显示最高,扁穗冰草在6∶4比例下叶长最高和在单播下的叶宽最高;在叶茎比的对比下3∶7比例中紫花苜蓿品质较高和单播扁穗冰草品质较高。【结论】混播有利于提升牧草株高、叶长叶宽、叶茎比、生物量贡献率。
Abstract:【Objective】Based on the climatic characteristics of Xinjiang and the demand of forage planting for the rapid development of modern animal husbandry, a relatively double-optimal mixed sowing pattern was derived based on exploring the influence of planting ratio on the production performance of forage.【Methods】The two forage grasses, Alfalfa and Flatgrass, were planted in the ratio of bean to grass(3:7, 4:6, 5:5, 6:4, 7:3) in comparison with single sowing, and the changes of growth index, stem to leaf ratio and biomass contribution in the year of sowing were analysed.【Results】Plant height tended to be highest in Alfalfa and Flatgrass at 4:6 and 7:3, respectively;Alfalfa showed the highest leaf length and width at 3:7, and Flatgrass showed the highest leaf length in6:4 ratio and the highest leaf width with single sowing; the quality of Alfalfa was higher in the 3:7 ratio and the quality of single sowing Flatgrass was higher in the comparison of leaf to stem ratio.【Conclusion】The mixed sowing was beneficial to improve plant height, leaf length and leaf width, leaf to stem ratio and biomass contribution.
[1]常生华,侯扶江,于应文,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区三种豆科人工草地的植被与土壤特征[J].生态学报,2004,24(5):932-937.
[2]王建文,赖志强.冬季豆禾牧草混播技术与效果研究进展[J].广西畜牧兽医,2011,27(03):186-188.
[3]庞丹波,李生宝,潘占兵,等.紫花苜蓿混播研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2014,42(27):9395-9397.
[4]邝肖,季婧,梁文学,等.北方寒区紫花苜蓿/无芒雀麦混播比例和刈割时期对青贮品质的影响[J].草业学报,2018,27(12):187-198.
[5]刘金平,游明鸿.生长抑制剂对老芒麦种群生物量结构、能量分配及倒伏率的影响[J].草业学报,2012,21(5):195-203.
[6]苟文龙,川西平原一年生牧草禾豆混播群落生产力特征研究[D],兰州:甘肃农业大学,2019.
[7]王博杰,唐海萍,何丽,等.农牧交错区旱作条件下苜蓿和冰草人工草地稳定性研究[J].草业学报,2016,25(4):222-229.
[8]杨曌,李红,黄新育,等.应用灰色关联度综合评价16个引进苜蓿品种的生产性能[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2015(1):105-108.
[9]姜慧敏,布仁图雅.豆科牧草与禾本科牧草的营养品质指标的比较研究[J].环境与发展,2014,26(08):65-72.
[10]杨浩宏.滴灌下施氮磷钾肥对苜蓿产量和品质的影响[D].阿拉尔:塔里木大学,2017.
[11]孙万斌.不同生境下20个紫花苜蓿品种的综合评价及不同生育期营养特性的比较[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2016.
[12]李艳阳.242份苜蓿品种产量与品质性状的比较及产量性状QTL关联分析[D].滁州:安徽科技学院,2018.
[13]巩皓,杨柳,李丹丹,等.寒地黑土农区紫花苜蓿生产与品质对施肥和刈割频次的响应及效益分析[J].中国农业科学,2020,53(13):2657-2667.
基本信息:
DOI:10.16863/j.cnki.1003-6377.2023.03.004
中图分类号:S54
引用信息:
[1]许莹月,柯梅,魏鹏等.佳能紫花苜蓿和扁穗冰草混播比例对播种当年牧草生产性能的影响[J].草食家畜,2023,No.220(03):20-25+41.DOI:10.16863/j.cnki.1003-6377.2023.03.004.
基金信息:
混播草地有机碳库创新团队项目(2022D14013); 塔县优质饲草混播模式试验项目(20230300025DBFZXC)