nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2024, 03, No.226 36-44
模拟干旱胁迫下5份野生披碱草属植物萌发期抗旱性评价
基金项目(Foundation): 国家现代农业产业技术体系项目“国家牧草产业技术体系”(CARS-34)
邮箱(Email): gll2002@163.com;
DOI: 10.16863/j.cnki.1003-6377.2024.03.005
摘要:

【目的】探究5份野生披碱草属种质材料萌发期的抗旱性,以期筛选出抗旱性较好的种质用于进一步种质抗旱研究。【方法】用PEG-6000作为模拟干旱处理试剂,将其配置成0%(蒸馏水)、5%、10%、15%、20%和25%6个浓度梯度的溶液,将不同浓度的溶液加入培养皿中,测定5份材料的发芽势、发芽率、萌发指数、活力指数、根长和芽长。【结果】随着PEG浓度的上升,5份材料的各指标均呈下降趋势,当浓度达到25%时各指标均达到最低值,E02、E04、E05材料已经不能萌发,而E01、E03虽然仍能萌发但萌发能力显著下降。【结论】5%浓度的PEG对材料发芽势和发芽率有一定的促进作用。5份材料的萌发期抗旱性排名为:E01>E05>E02>E03>E04。

Abstract:

【Objective】To investigate the drought resistance of 5 wild Elymus germplasm materials during the germination period, in order to screen out better germplasm for further research on drought resistance.【Methods】With PEG-6000 as the simulated drough treatment reagent,it is configured into 6 concentratio gradient sdutions of 0%(distilled water)、5%、10%、15%、20% and 25%.Different concentrations of solutions were added to culture dishes to determine the germination potential, germination rate,germination index, vitality index, root length and shoot length of the five materials.【Results】As the PEG concentration increased, all the indicators of the five materials showed a downward trend. When the concentration reached 25%, all the indicators reached their lowest values. E02, E04, and E05 materials could no longer germinate, while E01 and E03 could still germinate, but their germination ability was significantly insufficient.【Conclusion】5% concentration of PEG had a certain promoting effect on the germination potential and germination rate of the materials, and the drought resistance of the five materials during the germination period was ranked as follows: E01>E05>E02>E03>E04.

参考文献

[1]卢宝荣.披碱草属与大麦属系统关系的研究[J].植物分类学报,1997(03):193-207.

[2]严学兵,郭玉霞,周禾,等.披碱草属植物分类和遗传多样性的研究现状[J].草业科学,2005(07):1-7.

[3]苗佳敏,钟金城,陈智华.披碱草属种质资源研究现状[J].草业与畜牧,2009(08):1-6.

[4]李永祥,李斯深,李立会,等.披碱草属12个物种遗传多样性的ISSR和SSR比较分析[J].中国农业科学,2005(08):1522-1527.

[5]余优森.我国西部的干旱气候与农业对策[J].干旱地区农业研究,1992(01):1-8.

[6]陈托兄.不同生育时期紫花苜蓿秋眠型标准品种耐盐机制研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2009.

[7]徐雅梅,张卫红,蔺永和,等.Cu~(2+)、Zn~(2+)对西藏不同区域野生赖草萌发特性和生理效应的影响[J].草地学报,2017,25(05):1037-1046.

[8]龚磊,王立,何明珠,等.Ni~(2+)、Cu~(2+)胁迫对柠条种子萌发特征的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2013,27(03):197-201.

[9]李瑶,隋晓青,郝裕辉,等.干旱胁迫下新疆7份野生披碱草属种质材料萌发特性与抗旱性评价[J].新疆农业科学,2020,57(05):958-966.

[10]李培英,孙宗玖,阿不来提.PEG模拟干旱胁迫下29份偃麦草种质种子萌发期抗旱性评价[J].中国草地学报,2010,32(01):32-39.

[11]龚明.作物抗旱性鉴定方法与指标及其综合评价[J].云南农业大学学报,1989(01):73-81.

[12]吴永洁,王元素,李莉.国内白三叶研究进展[J].种子,2015,34(07):46-51.

[13]李明雨,王焱,梁丹妮,等.22份苜蓿种质萌发期耐盐性综合评价[J].浙江农业学报,2019,31(05):746-755.

[14]许翩翩,王建柱.三种常见边坡植物对模拟干旱环境抗旱性能的研究[J].草业学报,2018,27(02):36-47.

[15]张杰雪,王占青,全小龙,等.5种禾草种子萌发及幼苗生长对干旱胁迫的响应和抗旱性评价[J].草原与草坪,2022,42(01):21-28.

[16]徐婉宁,孙群策,张树振,等.两份老芒麦种质材料萌发期抗旱性评价[J].草食家畜,2023(05):45-50.

[17]卢前成,宁松瑞,颜安,等.PEG-6000干旱胁迫下18种牧草种子萌发特性与响应机制[J].江苏农业科学,2023,51(22):180-190.

[18]李瑞静.羊茅属3份种质材料草坪质量及抗逆性的比较[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2019.

[19]马海鸽,蒋齐,王占军,等.PEG胁迫下野生甘草种子萌发和幼苗生长[J].草业科学,2014,31(08):1487-1492.

[20] PATADE,VIKAS Y,SUJATA B,et al. Transcript Expression Profiling of Stress Responsive Genes in Response to Short-term Salt or PEG Stress in Sugarcane Leaves[J].Molecular Biology Reports,2012(39):3311-3318.

[21]李京蓉,马真,刘泽华,等.青海省6种高寒禾本科牧草的耐盐性[J].草业科学,2019,36(02):442-449.

[22]李威.PEG胁迫下6种裸燕麦品种种子萌发期的抗旱性研究[J].种子,2014,33(05):38-41.

[23]杨兴存,杜文华.6份紫花苜蓿品种萌发期耐盐性评价[J].种子,2015,34(12):40-43.

[24] MA Q L,KANG J M,LONG R C,et al. Proteomic Analysis of Salt and Osmotic-drought Stress in Alfalfa Seedlings[J].Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2016,15(10):2266-2278.

[25]陈新,宋高原,张宗文,等.PEG-6000胁迫下裸燕麦萌发期抗旱性鉴定与评价[J].植物遗传资源学报,2014,15(06):1188-1195.

[26]王赞,李源,吴欣明,等.PEG渗透胁迫下鸭茅种子萌发特性及抗旱性鉴定[J].中国草地学报,2008(01):50-55.

基本信息:

DOI:10.16863/j.cnki.1003-6377.2024.03.005

中图分类号:S543.9

引用信息:

[1]韩宇,梁洑汀,谷丽丽.模拟干旱胁迫下5份野生披碱草属植物萌发期抗旱性评价[J].草食家畜,2024,No.226(03):36-44.DOI:10.16863/j.cnki.1003-6377.2024.03.005.

基金信息:

国家现代农业产业技术体系项目“国家牧草产业技术体系”(CARS-34)

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文