nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2024, 05, No.228 44-50+64
哈密市荒漠草地植物多样性及其生态位特征分析
基金项目(Foundation): 2024年新疆维吾尔自治区财政林草专项资金项目“哈密市草原资源和有害生物常规监测”
邮箱(Email): 185024783@qq.com;
DOI: 10.16863/j.cnki.1003-6377.2024.05.007
摘要:

【目的】基于哈密市荒漠草地生态环境脆弱的实际状况,本研究旨在分析哈密市荒漠草地物种多样性和生态位特征,为哈密荒漠草地生态系统的保护和修复提供数据支撑。【方法】通过开展野外实地调查,结合生态位理论研究方法,计算哈密市荒漠草地植物多样性及其优势物种的生态位特征。【结果】结果显示,哈密市荒漠草地植物包括15科33属45种,以藜科植物为主,哈密市东天山南坡、北坡荒漠草地植物多样性没有显著差异;哈密市荒漠草地优势植被生态位宽度在0.006~1.283之间,生态位重叠的物种对有25对,其中膜果麻黄(Ephedra przewalskii Stapf)和木霸王(Sarcozygium xanthoxylon Bunge)的生态位重叠值最高。【结论】哈密市荒漠草地物种分布以藜科植物为主,天山南北气候差异对其荒漠草地植物多样性影响不显著,且优势植被生态位宽度、物种间生态位重叠值均不高,这说明哈密荒漠草地优势植被种间对环境资源的需求相似度不高,竞争不强。在实施荒漠草地生态修复的过程中要选择生态位宽度较宽的植被。

Abstract:

【Objective】Based on the actual situation of the fragile ecological environment of the desert grassland in Hami City,this study aims to analyze the species diversity and niche characteristics of the desert grassland in Hami City,and lay the foundation for the protection and restoration of the desert grassland ecosystem in Hami.【Methods】Vegetation diversity of desert steppe in Hami City as well as the niche characteristics of dominant species was calculated by field investigation in combination with theoretical research method of niche.【Results】There were 45 species of 33 genera of 15 families plants in the desert steppe,mainly Chenopodium. No significant difference was observed in plant diversity between south and north slopes of east Tianshan Mountains.The niche width of dominant vegetation in the desert steppe in Hami City ranged from 0.006 to 1.283,and there were 25species pairs with overlapping niches,among which,Ephedra przewalskii Stapf and Sarcozygium xanthoxylon Bunge had the highest overlapping value.【Conclusion】Chenopodium was the dominant species of desert steppe in Hami City,and the difference of climate between north and south Tianshan Mountains had no significant effect on vegetation diversity. The niche width of dominant vegetation and overlapping value between species were not high,indicating that the demand for environmental resources between dominant vegetation species in desert steppe was not very similar,hence the competition was not strong. In the process of ecological restoration of desert grassland,vegetation with wide niche width should be selected.

参考文献

[1]卫智军,牛富宝,刘红梅,等.短花针茅荒漠草原植物种群生态位对放牧的响应[J].中国草地学报,2015,37(5):24-32.

[2]马一明,李秋华,潘少朴,等.贵州高原花溪水库浮游植物优势种生态位及种间联结性动态分析[J].湖泊科学,2021,33(03):785-796.

[3]张婷,张建利,张晨,等. FAST周边喀斯特土壤养分资源轴的植物优势种生态位[J].生态学杂志,2023,42(08):1820-1828.

[4]刘鲁光,朱兆棋,陈曦,等.喜德县中坝村火烧迹地植被恢复初期优势种生态位与种间联结[J].西部林业科学,2022,51(01):110-117.

[5]聂莹莹,王国庆,彭芳华,等.围栏封育对呼伦贝尔草甸草原群落特征的影响[J].中国草地学报,2016,38(01):87-92.

[6]王冠琪,张克斌,程中秋,等.宁夏盐池荒漠草原植物的生态位研究[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2012,47(04):90-95.

[7]吴艳玲,卫智军,运向军,等.放牧对短花针茅荒漠草原植物种群生态位及生态属性的影响[J].中国草地学报,2018,40(02):81-88.

[8]阿斯太肯·居力海提,董乙强,周时杰,等.封育对不同草地类型植物群落多样性及生态位特征的影响—以新疆不同类型草地为例[J].草业科学,2023,40(05):1168-1185.

[9]刘艳,郑越月,敖艳艳.不同生长基质的苔藓植物优势种生态位与种间联结[J].生态学报,2019,39(01):286-293.

[10]卢燕,吴万平,曾勇.天山北麓绿洲荒漠过渡带优势植物的生态位特征与种间联结[J].中国沙漠,2024,44(2):254-263.

[11]董乙强.禁牧对中度退化伊犁绢蒿荒漠植被和土壤活性有机碳组的影响[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学,2016.

[12] LEVINSR. Evolution in Changing Environments:Some Theoretical Explorations[J]. Monographs in Population Biology,1968(2):1-120.

[13] COLWELLRK,FUTUYMADJ. On the Measurement of Niche Breadth and Overlap[J]. Ecology,1971,52(4):567-576.

[14] PIANKAER. The Structure of Lizard Communities[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1973,4(1):53-74.

[15]苏金娟,刘永萍,刘丽燕,等.阿勒泰荒漠区草本植物生态位与种间关联[J].草业科学,2024,5(30):1-21.

[16]刘润红,陈乐,涂洪润,等.桂林岩溶石山青冈群落灌木层主要物种生态位与种间联结[J].生态学报,2020,40(06):2057-2071.

[17]陈龙涛,石晓东,高润梅.山西陵川南方红豆杉群落种间联结与生态位特征研究[J].植物科学学报,2016,34(04):521-529.

基本信息:

DOI:10.16863/j.cnki.1003-6377.2024.05.007

中图分类号:S812

引用信息:

[1]黎松松,王宏洋.哈密市荒漠草地植物多样性及其生态位特征分析[J].草食家畜,2024,No.228(05):44-50+64.DOI:10.16863/j.cnki.1003-6377.2024.05.007.

基金信息:

2024年新疆维吾尔自治区财政林草专项资金项目“哈密市草原资源和有害生物常规监测”

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文