nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2020, 02, No.201 36-39
加拿大肉用褐牛种公牛后代生产性能对比分析
基金项目(Foundation): 现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金资助(nycytx-37); 自治区重点研发计划项目(2017B01001); 国家重点研发计划课题(2018YFD0501801)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.16863/j.cnki.1003-6377.2020.02.007
摘要:

为了筛选适宜的种公牛用于新疆褐牛肉用类型选育及群体杂交改良,选择两个家系的12、18、24月龄种公牛后代120头,比较分析其后代的超声波活体测定、体重、体尺等各项指标,结果表明:188号公牛后代12、18、24月龄背膘、眼高、12-13肋QIB、眼肌面积与4008号公牛后代差异均不显著(P>0.05),12月龄、18月龄、24月龄体重显著大于4008号公牛后代(P<0.05),12月龄、24月龄体高和18月龄体斜长、尻长显著高于4008号公牛后代(P<0.05),12月龄、24月龄胸围、尻长极显著高于4008号公牛后代(P<0.01)。结论:188号公牛后代产肉性能、尻部发育、体格等各项性能指标均好于4008号公牛后代,将188号公牛定位首选种公牛。

Abstract:

In order to select suitable breeding bulls for selection and population cross-breeding improvement of Xinjiang brown beef cattle, 120 progenies of breeding bulls at the ages of 12, 18, and 24 months from two families were selected, and their ultrasonic bioassay, body weight and body size and other indicators were compared and analyzed. The results showed that the difference of backfat, eye height, 12-13 rib QIB, and eye muscle area between No.188 and No.4008 progeny of 12, 18, and 24 months was not significant(P> 0.05); the body weight of No.188 progeny of 12, 18, and 24 months was significantly greater than that of No.4008 progeny(P<0.05); the body height of No.188 progeny of 12 and 24 months, and body oblique length and rump length of 18 months were significantly higher than those of No.4008 progeny(P<0.05); the chest circumference and rump length of No.188 progeny of 12 and 24 months were extremely significantly higher than those of No.4008 progeny. In conclusion, the meat production performance, rump and physical development and other performance indicators of the No.188 bull progeny were better than those of the No.4008 progeny, and the No.188 progeny was positioned as the preferred breeding bull.

参考文献

[1]赵庆明,许尚忠,李晓晶,等.超声波扫描仪对肉牛活体测定的研究[C].全国养牛科学研讨会暨中国畜牧兽医学会养牛学分会第六届会员代表大会论文集, 2005.

[2]王少华,王飞,杭孝,等.兽用B超仪在牛活体检测中的应用[J].中国奶牛,2015,(05):26-28.

[3]李娜,周振勇,闫向民,等.超声波技术在肉牛宰前评定中的应用[J].现代农业科技,2014,(15):283-285.

[4] Herring W, Miller D, Bertrand J, et al. Evaluation of machine, technician, and interpreter effects on ultrasonic measures of backfat and longissimus muscle area in beef cattle[J]. Journal of animal science,1994, 72(9):2216-2226.

[5] Schrder U J, Staufenbiel R. Invited review:Methods to determine body fat reserves in the dairy cow with special regard to ultrasonographic measurement of backfat thickness[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2006, 89(1):1-14.

[6] Trubenbach L, Wickersham T, Carstens G, et al. Managing energy requirements in confined cows[C]. Dr.Kenneth S. and Caroline McDonald Eng Foundation Symposium, San Antonio, TX, 2014:19-25.

[7] Herd D B, Sprott L R. Body condition, nutrition and reproduction of beef cows[J]. Texas FARMER Collection, 1986.

[8]李红燕. 3个黄牛品种的年龄,体重与产肉性能的相关分析[J].养殖技术顾问,2009,(1):132-133.

[9]蔺宏凯,张杨,周振勇,等.新疆褐牛体尺性状指标与体重的主成分分析[J].中国畜牧兽医,2010,37(8):130-133.

[10]王丹,周靖航,刘丽元,等.新疆褐牛体尺体重相关性及主成分分析[J].中国畜牧杂志,2017, 53(9):38-41.

基本信息:

DOI:10.16863/j.cnki.1003-6377.2020.02.007

中图分类号:S823

引用信息:

[1]周建忠,闫向民,张志恒等.加拿大肉用褐牛种公牛后代生产性能对比分析[J].草食家畜,2020,No.201(02):36-39.DOI:10.16863/j.cnki.1003-6377.2020.02.007.

基金信息:

现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金资助(nycytx-37); 自治区重点研发计划项目(2017B01001); 国家重点研发计划课题(2018YFD0501801)

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文